Architect vs. Plan Expeditor: Who Handles Permits?

Obtaining permits is a vital component in initiating any construction project, but determining who is responsible for submitting these documents can be nuanced. It is a common misconception that architects are always tasked with permit submission; however, this is not necessarily accurate.

Architect’s Role

Architects are primarily responsible for designing buildings and ensuring all plans adhere to applicable codes and regulations. They typically prepare the necessary documentation and drawings required for permitting. However, their core expertise lies in design and regulatory compliance rather than managing the approval process.

Plan Expeditor’s Role

Plan Expeditors possess specialized knowledge of the permitting process. Their responsibilities include organizing paperwork, tracking application progress, and liaising with municipal authorities to facilitate timely approvals. While architects provide the technical plans, expeditors ensure these submissions are processed efficiently.

Key Distinctions

·       Architect: Designs and prepares permit documentation.

·       Plan Expeditor: Manages submission, monitors progress, and addresses issues to expedite permit approval.

Employing both professionals can optimize workflow and minimize delays—architects concentrate on achieving design quality, while expeditors help maintain project timelines by streamlining the permitting process.